Abstract Cervical cancer is a common and an important public health problem for adult women in developing countries. In contrast, cervical cancer incidence is low in Saudi Arabia. High-risk types of human papilloma viruses (HPV16 and HPV18) are the most significant risk factors for cervical cancer. HPV16/18-E6 oncoprotein is associated with HPV etiology, viral persistence and epithelial transformation. Cell cycle protein p16 INK4a (p16) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of cervical carcinomas. The aims of this study were to investigate the expression of HPV16/18-E6 and p16 in uterine cervical carcinomas in Qassim Region - Saudi Arabia, and to relate the results to the established clinicopathological prognostic parameters (age of the patient, educational level, birth control methods, number of pregnancy, smoking status, degree of histological differentiation, clinical stage, and lymph node metastasis) The study included 40 specimens of uterine cervical squamous cell carcinomas diagnosed and confirmed by biopsy. Histopathological classification of cervical tumors cases was performed according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Immunohistochemical analysis for HPV16/18-E6 and p16 were carried out on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of cervical tissues using avidin-biotin peroxidase method. There was a significant statistical correlation between HPV16/18-E6 expression in cervical carcinoma and nationality, smoking status and size of the tumor. HPV16/18-E6 oncoprotein expression in normal lymphocytes and endothelial cells in the tumor tissues and the adjacent normal cervical tissues suggest the possibility that HPV infection might spread to other organs through blood circulation. P16 expression has been correlated with high grade, stage of cervical SCC and HPV16/18-E6 expression. The current study supports the critical function of p16 and HPV16/18-E6 as specific markers for cervical carcinoma. However the potential for usage of p16 and HPV16/18-E6 as prognostic markers will require detailed follow data for a larger group of patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of primary versus secondary ureteroscopy for pediatric ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review study that included 66 children aged less than 12 years, who were subdivided into two groups: Group A, which included 42 children who had undergone primary ureteroscopy without pre-stenting; and Group B, which included 24 children who had undergone ureteroscopy after ureteric stenting. Kidneys, ureters and bladder radiographs were done on the first postoperative day to assess the degree of stone clearance and stent position. RESULTS: Age, gender, stone location and stone size were not significantly different between both groups. In Group A, 31 (73.8%) children required ureteric dilation, 13 (31%) had a tight ureter that failed to respond to dilation, 25 (59.5%) displayed complete stone clearance, and of these, 13 (52%) needed postoperative stenting. One child experienced ureteric injury during stone disintegration and was stented for two weeks. Children in Group B experienced a 95.8% complete stone clearance rate, with no ureteric injury reported; postoperative stenting was performed in three (12.5%) children.. CONCLUSION: Secondary ureteroscopy is preferable over primary ureteroscopy in pediatric populations because of a significantly lower need for ureteric dilation, shorter procedure time and better stone clearance rate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of primary versus secondary ureteroscopy for pediatric ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review study that included 66 children aged less than 12 years, who were subdivided into two groups: Group A, which included 42 children who had undergone primary ureteroscopy without pre-stenting; and Group B, which included 24 children who had undergone ureteroscopy after ureteric stenting. Kidneys, ureters and bladder radiographs were done on the first postoperative day to assess the degree of stone clearance and stent position. RESULTS: Age, gender, stone location and stone size were not significantly different between both groups. In Group A, 31 (73.8%) children required ureteric dilation, 13 (31%) had a tight ureter that failed to respond to dilation, 25 (59.5%) displayed complete stone clearance, and of these, 13 (52%) needed postoperative stenting. One child experienced ureteric injury during stone disintegration and was stented for two weeks. Children in Group B experienced a 95.8% complete stone clearance rate, with no ureteric injury reported; postoperative stenting was performed in three (12.5%) children.. CONCLUSION: Secondary ureteroscopy is preferable over primary ureteroscopy in pediatric populations because of a significantly lower need for ureteric dilation, shorter procedure time and better stone clearance rate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of primary versus secondary ureteroscopy for pediatric ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review study that included 66 children aged less than 12 years, who were subdivided into two groups: Group A, which included 42 children who had undergone primary ureteroscopy without pre-stenting; and Group B, which included 24 children who had undergone ureteroscopy after ureteric stenting. Kidneys, ureters and bladder radiographs were done on the first postoperative day to assess the degree of stone clearance and stent position. RESULTS: Age, gender, stone location and stone size were not significantly different between both groups. In Group A, 31 (73.8%) children required ureteric dilation, 13 (31%) had a tight ureter that failed to respond to dilation, 25 (59.5%) displayed complete stone clearance, and of these, 13 (52%) needed postoperative stenting. One child experienced ureteric injury during stone disintegration and was stented for two weeks. Children in Group B experienced a 95.8% complete stone clearance rate, with no ureteric injury reported; postoperative stenting was performed in three (12.5%) children.. CONCLUSION: Secondary ureteroscopy is preferable over primary ureteroscopy in pediatric populations because of a significantly lower need for ureteric dilation, shorter procedure time and better stone clearance rate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of primary versus secondary ureteroscopy for pediatric ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review study that included 66 children aged less than 12 years, who were subdivided into two groups: Group A, which included 42 children who had undergone primary ureteroscopy without pre-stenting; and Group B, which included 24 children who had undergone ureteroscopy after ureteric stenting. Kidneys, ureters and bladder radiographs were done on the first postoperative day to assess the degree of stone clearance and stent position. RESULTS: Age, gender, stone location and stone size were not significantly different between both groups. In Group A, 31 (73.8%) children required ureteric dilation, 13 (31%) had a tight ureter that failed to respond to dilation, 25 (59.5%) displayed complete stone clearance, and of these, 13 (52%) needed postoperative stenting. One child experienced ureteric injury during stone disintegration and was stented for two weeks. Children in Group B experienced a 95.8% complete stone clearance rate, with no ureteric injury reported; postoperative stenting was performed in three (12.5%) children.. CONCLUSION: Secondary ureteroscopy is preferable over primary ureteroscopy in pediatric populations because of a significantly lower need for ureteric dilation, shorter procedure time and better stone clearance rate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of primary versus secondary ureteroscopy for pediatric ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review study that included 66 children aged less than 12 years, who were subdivided into two groups: Group A, which included 42 children who had undergone primary ureteroscopy without pre-stenting; and Group B, which included 24 children who had undergone ureteroscopy after ureteric stenting. Kidneys, ureters and bladder radiographs were done on the first postoperative day to assess the degree of stone clearance and stent position. RESULTS: Age, gender, stone location and stone size were not significantly different between both groups. In Group A, 31 (73.8%) children required ureteric dilation, 13 (31%) had a tight ureter that failed to respond to dilation, 25 (59.5%) displayed complete stone clearance, and of these, 13 (52%) needed postoperative stenting. One child experienced ureteric injury during stone disintegration and was stented for two weeks. Children in Group B experienced a 95.8% complete stone clearance rate, with no ureteric injury reported; postoperative stenting was performed in three (12.5%) children.. CONCLUSION: Secondary ureteroscopy is preferable over primary ureteroscopy in pediatric populations because of a significantly lower need for ureteric dilation, shorter procedure time and better stone clearance rate.

تهدف الدراسة الي مقارنة الحساسية و الدقة التشخيصية للاشعة التليفزيونية او السونار في حالات غياب الحيوانات المنوية في السائل المنوي مقارنة بنتائج عينة الخصية التشخيصية وقد أجرين الدراسة مجموعة من الرجال يبلغ عددهم 268 رجل يعانون من غياب الحيوانات المنوية في السائل المنوي الذين قد خضعوا سابقا لاجراء عينة تشخيصية من الخصية وقد تم اجراء فحص لهم باستخدام جهاز الدوبلر الملون علي الخصية مع فحص سونار عن طريق المستقيم . و تم عمل تسجيل للنتائج الايجابية والسلبية بالسونار و التي ترجح وجود انسداد في مجري السائل المنوي او وجود ضعف في وظائف الخصية في الحالات و تقسيم الحالات بناءا علي تلك النتائج الي حالات انسداد و حالات قصور وظيفي ثم عمل مقارنة لتلك النتائج بالسونار مع نتائج الباثولوجي لعينة الخصية التشخيصية في جميع الحالات لمعرفة مدي دقة السونار في الوصول لتشخيص الانسداد او القصور الوظيفي. وقد اظهرت النتائج ان فحص الدوبلر علي الخصية ذات حساسية تشخيصية اكثر في حالات القصور الوظيفي. اما فحص السونار عن طريق المستقيم فقد أظهر حساسية تشخيصية أكثر في حالات الانسداد كما ان الفحص بالسونار عامة أكثر دقة تشخيصية في حالات الانسداد ولكن لا يغني كلية عن التشخيص عن طريق فحص الباثولوجي لعينة الخصية.