Introduction Acetabular cup version is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many methods have been described for measurement of cup version angle. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of five commonly used methods for measurement of acetabular cup version in plain antero-posterior views of the pelvis and hip. Material and methods Sixty primary THA cases were subjected postoperatively to plain A-P of the pelvis (AP-P), A-P view of the hip (AP-H), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The acetabular cup version was measured in AP-P and AP-H by five methods (Lewinnek, Widmer, Hassan et al., Ackland et al., and Liaw et al.). These measurements were compared to the CT measurement. Results All plain X-ray methods showed no significant differences from the CT, except …

Introduction Acetabular cup version is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many methods have been described for measurement of cup version angle. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of five commonly used methods for measurement of acetabular cup version in plain antero-posterior views of the pelvis and hip. Material and methods Sixty primary THA cases were subjected postoperatively to plain A-P of the pelvis (AP-P), A-P view of the hip (AP-H), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The acetabular cup version was measured in AP-P and AP-H by five methods (Lewinnek, Widmer, Hassan et al., Ackland et al., and Liaw et al.). These measurements were compared to the CT measurement. Results All plain X-ray methods showed no significant differences from the CT, except …

Introduction Acetabular cup version is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many methods have been described for measurement of cup version angle. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of five commonly used methods for measurement of acetabular cup version in plain antero-posterior views of the pelvis and hip. Material and methods Sixty primary THA cases were subjected postoperatively to plain A-P of the pelvis (AP-P), A-P view of the hip (AP-H), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The acetabular cup version was measured in AP-P and AP-H by five methods (Lewinnek, Widmer, Hassan et al., Ackland et al., and Liaw et al.). These measurements were compared to the CT measurement. Results All plain X-ray methods showed no significant differences from the CT, except …

Introduction Acetabular cup version is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many methods have been described for measurement of cup version angle. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of five commonly used methods for measurement of acetabular cup version in plain antero-posterior views of the pelvis and hip. Material and methods Sixty primary THA cases were subjected postoperatively to plain A-P of the pelvis (AP-P), A-P view of the hip (AP-H), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The acetabular cup version was measured in AP-P and AP-H by five methods (Lewinnek, Widmer, Hassan et al., Ackland et al., and Liaw et al.). These measurements were compared to the CT measurement. Results All plain X-ray methods showed no significant differences from the CT, except …

Introduction Acetabular cup version is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many methods have been described for measurement of cup version angle. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of five commonly used methods for measurement of acetabular cup version in plain antero-posterior views of the pelvis and hip. Material and methods Sixty primary THA cases were subjected postoperatively to plain A-P of the pelvis (AP-P), A-P view of the hip (AP-H), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The acetabular cup version was measured in AP-P and AP-H by five methods (Lewinnek, Widmer, Hassan et al., Ackland et al., and Liaw et al.). These measurements were compared to the CT measurement. Results All plain X-ray methods showed no significant differences from the CT, except …

Introduction Acetabular cup version is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many methods have been described for measurement of cup version angle. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of five commonly used methods for measurement of acetabular cup version in plain antero-posterior views of the pelvis and hip. Material and methods Sixty primary THA cases were subjected postoperatively to plain A-P of the pelvis (AP-P), A-P view of the hip (AP-H), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The acetabular cup version was measured in AP-P and AP-H by five methods (Lewinnek, Widmer, Hassan et al., Ackland et al., and Liaw et al.). These measurements were compared to the CT measurement. Results All plain X-ray methods showed no significant differences from the CT, except …

Introduction Acetabular cup version is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many methods have been described for measurement of cup version angle. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of five commonly used methods for measurement of acetabular cup version in plain antero-posterior views of the pelvis and hip. Material and methods Sixty primary THA cases were subjected postoperatively to plain A-P of the pelvis (AP-P), A-P view of the hip (AP-H), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The acetabular cup version was measured in AP-P and AP-H by five methods (Lewinnek, Widmer, Hassan et al., Ackland et al., and Liaw et al.). These measurements were compared to the CT measurement. Results All plain X-ray methods showed no significant differences from the CT, except …

Introduction Acetabular cup version is crucial for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many methods have been described for measurement of cup version angle. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of five commonly used methods for measurement of acetabular cup version in plain antero-posterior views of the pelvis and hip. Material and methods Sixty primary THA cases were subjected postoperatively to plain A-P of the pelvis (AP-P), A-P view of the hip (AP-H), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. The acetabular cup version was measured in AP-P and AP-H by five methods (Lewinnek, Widmer, Hassan et al., Ackland et al., and Liaw et al.). These measurements were compared to the CT measurement. Results All plain X-ray methods showed no significant differences from the CT, except …

Aim: Assessing the diagnostic role of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in indeterminate mammographic breast lesions and postulated a diagnostic model for MRI interpretation integrating the morphological, and functional parameters. Material and Methods: Two hundred forty patients included in a self-control retrospective study in a tertiary center. All patients examined with 1.5T MR unit using multiparametric studies including morphological analysis followed by functional evaluation via MR diffusion (MR-DWI), spectroscopy(MRS), and kinetic enhanced curves (DCE-MRI). Diagnostic performance of each parameter was evaluated alone and in combination. The histopathological results were the standard of reference. Results: Combined mpMRI parameters possess a moderate agreement (κ=0.435) with 23.5% false discovery rate (FDR) and an overall accuracy of 78%.On the other hand, combined mpMRI data after omitting MRS data show almost perfect agreement (κ=0.923)with histopathological data and recorded 100% specificity, 90% specificity, 5% FDR and zero% for both false omission rate (FOR) and false-negative rate (FNR). The Quantitative analysis of DWI with ADC map shows a significant statistical value for mean ADC (m-ADC) value and relative ADC (r-ADC) value. The former has cutoff value 1.1x10-3 mm2/sec with higher specificity 97.5% while r-ADC has cutoff value 0.42x10-3 mm2/sec with quite lower specificity 85%. Perfect agreement in the interpretation of DCE-MRI curves, MR-DWI, and MRS with κ =0.92,0.9 and 0.84 respectively. Conclusion: Tailored combined multiparametric MRI is a potent diagnostic tool in the …

Aim: Assessing the diagnostic role of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in indeterminate mammographic breast lesions and postulated a diagnostic model for MRI interpretation integrating the morphological, and functional parameters. Material and Methods: Two hundred forty patients included in a self-control retrospective study in a tertiary center. All patients examined with 1.5T MR unit using multiparametric studies including morphological analysis followed by functional evaluation via MR diffusion (MR-DWI), spectroscopy(MRS), and kinetic enhanced curves (DCE-MRI). Diagnostic performance of each parameter was evaluated alone and in combination. The histopathological results were the standard of reference. Results: Combined mpMRI parameters possess a moderate agreement (κ=0.435) with 23.5% false discovery rate (FDR) and an overall accuracy of 78%.On the other hand, combined mpMRI data after omitting MRS data show almost perfect agreement (κ=0.923)with histopathological data and recorded 100% specificity, 90% specificity, 5% FDR and zero% for both false omission rate (FOR) and false-negative rate (FNR). The Quantitative analysis of DWI with ADC map shows a significant statistical value for mean ADC (m-ADC) value and relative ADC (r-ADC) value. The former has cutoff value 1.1x10-3 mm2/sec with higher specificity 97.5% while r-ADC has cutoff value 0.42x10-3 mm2/sec with quite lower specificity 85%. Perfect agreement in the interpretation of DCE-MRI curves, MR-DWI, and MRS with κ =0.92,0.9 and 0.84 respectively. Conclusion: Tailored combined multiparametric MRI is a potent diagnostic tool in the …