Skip to main content

Elective surgery system strengthening development, measurement, and validation of the surgical preparedness index across 1632 hospitals in 119 countries

Research Abstract

Background The 2015 Lancet Commission on global surgery identified surgery and anaesthesia as indispensable parts of holistic health-care systems. However, COVID-19 exposed the fragility of planned surgical services around the world, which have also been neglected in pandemic recovery planning. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel index to support local elective surgical system strengthening and address growing backlogs. Methods First, we performed an international consultation through a four-stage consensus process to develop a multidomain index for hospital-level assessment (surgical preparedness index; SPI). Second, we measured surgical preparedness across a global network of hospitals in high-income countries (HICs), middle-income countries (MICs), and low-income countries (LICs) to explore the distribution of the SPI at national, subnational, and hospital levels. Finally, using COVID-19 as an example of an external system shock, we compared hospitals' SPI to their planned surgical volume ratio (SVR; ie, operations for which the decision for surgery was made before hospital admission), calculated as the ratio of the observed surgical volume over a 1-month assessment period between June 6 and Aug 5, 2021, against the expected surgical volume based on hospital administrative data from the same period in 2019 (ie, a pre-pandemic baseline). A linear mixed-effects regression model was used to determine the effect of increasing SPI score.

Research Authors
NIHR Global Health Unit on Global Surgery- COVIDSurg Collaborative
Research Date
Research Department
Research Journal
The Lancet
Research Pages
1607-1617
Research Publisher
Elsevier
Research Vol
400
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01
Research Year
2022

To what extent AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine is safe and effective? Rapid systematic review

Research Abstract

Until now, there are more than two hundred million confirmed cases of COVID-19 including more than seven million deaths. Clinical trials of all three vaccines authorized for use in the UK (Pfizer–BioNTech, Oxford–AstraZeneca, and Moderna) have reported high vaccine efficacy. This rapid systematic review was initiated because no systematic review had been conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine.

Evidence acquisition

A systematic search in the following platforms: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, WOS, and MEDLINE databases for all articles in the English language regarding safety and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was performed. Papers published up to end of June were included.

Evidence synthesis

Out of 477 retrieved articles, fifteen are included. All the selected articles are concerned with evaluation of AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 

Research Authors
Aliae AR Mohamed Hussein, Islam H Ibrahim, Islam A Mahmoud, Marwa Amary, Reem Sayad
Research Date
Research Department
Research Publisher
Springer
Research Vol
16
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-021-00109
Research Year
2022

Value of montelukast as a potential treatment of post-COVID-19 persistent cough: a non-randomized controlled pilot study

Research Abstract

Background

This pilot study included 68 cases with post-COVID-19 persistent cough (> 8 weeks), randomly allocated into two groups; intervention group (32 patients) received standard cough therapy, and montelukast 10 mg/day for 14 days and control group (36 patients) received only cough sedatives.

Results

We found a significant improvement in the number of cough paroxysms/day, cough severity visual analog scale, cough severity index and cough quality of life, shorter duration improvement, and minimal side effects in the interventional group.

Conclusions

We suggest that montelukast may be effective to reduce the duration and severity of the persistent post-COVID-19 cough and further improve quality of life.

Research Authors
Aliae AR Mohamed Hussein, Mohamed Eltaher AA Ibrahim, Hoda A Makhlouf, Nahed A Makhlouf, Howaida K Abd-Elaal, Karima MS Kholief, Islam G Sayed
Research Date
Research Department
Research Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Research Publisher
Springer
Research Vol
16
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-022-00154-6
Research Year
2022

The PROVENT-C19 registry: A study protocol for international multicenter SIAARTI registry on the use of prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS

Research Abstract

Background

The worldwide use of prone position (PP) for invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 is progressively increasing from the first pandemic wave in everyday clinical practice. Among the suggested treatments for the management of ARDS patients, PP was recommended in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 guidelines as an adjuvant therapy for improving ventilation. In patients with severe classical ARDS, some authors reported that early application of prolonged PP sessions significantly decreases 28-day and 90-day mortality.

Methods and analysis

Since January 2021, the COVID19 Veneto ICU Network research group has developed and implemented nationally and internationally the “PROVENT-C19 Registry”, endorsed by the Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care…’(SIAARTI). The PROVENT-C19 Registry wishes to describe 1. The real clinical practice on the use of PP in COVID-19 patients during the pandemic at a National and International level; and 2. Potential baseline and clinical characteristics that identify subpopulations of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 that may improve daily from PP therapy. This web-based registry will provide relevant information on how the database research tools may improve our daily clinical practice.

Conclusions

This multicenter, prospective registry is the first to identify and characterize the role of PP on clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients. In recent years, data emerging from large registries have been increasingly used to provide real-world evidence on the effectiveness, quality, and safety of a clinical intervention. Indeed …

Research Authors
Silvia De Rosa, Nicolò Sella, Emanuele Rezoagli, Giulia Lorenzoni, Dario Gregori, Giacomo Bellani, Giuseppe Foti, Tommaso Pettenuzzo, Fabio Baratto, Giorgio Fullin, Francesco Papaccio, Mario Peta, Daniele Poole, Fabio Toffoletto, Salvatore Maurizio Maggio
Research Department
Research Journal
Plos one
Research Publisher
Public Library of Science
Research Vol
17
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276261
Research Year
2022

COVID-19 pandemic: perception, attitude, and practices of university students from health sector faculties

Research Abstract

Background

Adherence to preventive control measures is influenced by perception, attitudes, and practices toward the disease prevention.

Aim

To assess the perceptions, attitude, and practices of university students in three health sector faculties (Medicine, Nursing, and Pharmacy) from six Egyptian universities towards COVID-19 pandemic prevention.

Methods

An electronic online survey was distributed to students of 3 faculties (Medicine, Pharmacy, and Nursing) in six Egyptian universities from March to July 2021. The questionnaire consists of the following parts: socio-demographic data of participants, student perception and attitude towards the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences, as well as practices of preventive measures in the community.

Results

The study included 1990 participants. Most respondents perceived the seriousness of the COVID-19 pandemic (88.2%). The rates of practicing precautionary 

Research Authors
Basma Mohamed Osman, Shaimaa S Abdelrheem, Ramy M El Sabaa, Farida Kamel Yousef, Aliae AR Mohamed Hussein, Nermen M Abuelkassem, Salwa A Atlam
Research Date
Research Department
Research Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Research Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Research Vol
17
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-023-00177-7
Research Year
2023

Clinical characteristics and outcome of COVID-19 patients with non cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

Research Abstract

Introduction

Bronchiectasis was considered as an uncommon radiological feature of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. The clinical course and outcome of COVID-19 bronchiectasis overlap is still a point for research. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, course, and outcome of bronchiectasis as an atypical presentation of COVID-19 infection.

Methods

A cross-sectional study has been conducted from July 2021 to February 2022 and included 425 COVID-19 swab-positive patients who were examined by high resolution computed tomography of the chest during acute phase (4 weeks) of the infection.

Results

Fourteen (3.3%) patients newly developed bronchiectasis-de novo. Patients with de novo bronchiectasis had significantly higher cough score, frequency of colored sputum and mMRC score, respiratory distress (p < 0.001) and respiratory failure (p = 0.02) than patients with no bronchiectasis. They also had the higher frequency of ICU’s admission (p = 0.02), need to non-invasive (p = 0.01), and invasive mechanical ventilation (p = < 0.001), duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU’s stay and overall hospital stay (p < 0.001). As for the outcome, death rate was also statistically significantly higher among those with De novo bronchiectasis than those without bronchiectasis (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Bronchiectasis is an uncommon presentation among COVID-19 patients. However, bronchiectasis increases disease burden in COVID-19 patients. It may have a negative impact on the outcome.

 

Research Authors
Aliae Mohamed-Hussein, Ahmad Shaddad, Maiada Hashem, Maha Okasha
Research Date
Research Department
Research Journal
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Research Publisher
Springer
Research Vol
59
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-022-00164-4

The clinical frailty scale, but not the FRAIL checklist is associated with mortality in old critically ill patients with COVID-19

Research Abstract

Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterized by decreased reserve and resilience [1]. Identifying frailty in critically ill patients can help to guide management, including the selection of appropriate interventions and the development of care plans such as time-limited trials in patients with an unclear benefit from critical care. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the FRAIL checklist (1) are both tools proposed to assess frailty in older adults, but they have some key differences. The CFS is a simple, ordinal scale that assigns a score of 1 to 9 based on an assessment of the patient’s level of frailty. It takes into account various physical and functional characteristics. It is quick and easy to use, and it has been validated in multiple settings [2–4]. The FRAIL checklist assesses five domains of frailty: functional impairment, recurrent hospitalizations, advanced malignancy and chronic diseases, irreversible organ failure, and long …

Research Authors
Bernhard Wernly, Hans Flaatten, Susannah Leaver, Bertrand Guidet, Christian Jung on behalf of the COVIP investigators
Research Date
Research Department
Research Journal
Critical Care
Research Publisher
Biomed Central
Research Vol
27
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04398-
Research Year
2023

Improving frailty assessment: the task is not finished

Research Abstract

We would like to express our sincere gratitude for the thoughtful comments made by Cheung et al. in their response to our letter [1]. We evaluated the distribution and prognostic relevance of previously proposed surrogate parameters for frailty, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)[2–4] and the FRAIL checklist [5], in our database and found that in the univariate analysis, both were associated with 90-day mortality. However, after multivariable adjustment for age, gender, SOFA score, and the presence of therapy goal limitations, only the CFS, but not the FRAIL checklist, was still associated with mortality. We concluded that the CFS has added value compared to the FRAIL checklist. Cheung et al. pointed out that the rate of patients with CFS> 4 was higher than those with

FRAIL> 0. We agree with Cheung et al.’s assessment that the items of the FRAIL checklist are less concrete than the pictograms of the CFS, and this could be a …

Research Authors
Bernhard Wernly, Hans Flaatten, Susannah Leaver, Bertrand Guidet, Christian Jung on behalf of COVIP investigators
Research Date
Research Department
Research Journal
Critical Care
Research Publisher
BioMed Central
Research Vol
27
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04477-8
Research Year
2023

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Research Abstract

Background

Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres.

Methods

This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries.

Results

In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified …

Research Authors
National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery
Research Date
Research Department
Research Journal
British Journal of Surgery
Research Publisher
Oxford University Press
Research Vol
110
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad092
Research Year
2023

A meta analysis on the utility of Anakinra in severe COVID-19 disease

Research Abstract

Background and objective

The most important presentation of COVID-19 is hyper inflammatory condition and cytokine storm that occurs due to excessive increase of the inflammatory mediators specially, pro-inflammatory interleukins such as IL-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α which have an important role in the cytokine storm pathway. Up till now there is not a definitive treatment for COVID-19 disease, but according to the pathophysiology of the disease, Anakinra (Interleukin- 1 inhibitor) is an adjuvant treatment option in patients with severe COVID-19 by blocking the effect of IL-1. So, we aimed to summarize the studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of Anakinra in patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

Methods

We performed a search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS) databases from inception till 7 Jan 2022. Additionally, we searched randomized and non-randomized 

Research Authors
Aliae AR Mohamed Hussein, Reem Sayad, Abdelrahman Abdelshafi, Islam Abdelaal Hammam, Ahmed M Kedwany, Shrouk Alaa-eldein Elkholy, Islam H Ibrahim
Research Date
Research Department
Research Journal
Cytokine
Research Publisher
Academic Press
Research Vol
169
Research Website
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2023.156311
Research Year
2023
Subscribe to