NULL

Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery has been developed in attempt to further reduce the morbidity and scarring associated with surgical intervention. OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique and report the surgical outcomes of LESS radical nephrectomy (RN) in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: LESS-RN was performed in 33 patients with renal tumours. The indications to perform a LESS-RN were represented by renal tumours not greater than T2 and without

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility, advantages, and disadvantages of the laparo-endoscopic single site surgery (LESS) technique for balloon vaginoplasty (BV). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care facility. RESULTS: LESS-BV was successfully performed in 6 patients with Mullerian aplasia and one with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). Patients presented with failure of intravaginal intercourse and/or dyspareunia. The procedure was performed successfully in conjunction with gonadectomy for the AIS case. The total operative time was 50-75 minutes. No operative complications were reported. Postoperative pain scores ranged from 0 to 2 points at rest and from 20 to 60 points during dressing change, increasing distension, and traction. The depths of the constructed neovaginas measured up to 12.8 cm. Sexual intercourse was initiated on the day of catheter removal. Penetrations and satisfactions scores increased to up 90 points for both partners. CONCLUSIONS: LESS-BV is technically feasible. LESS-BV allows better, stronger midline and long traction pass along the anatomic longitudinal axis of the hypoplastic vagina. Surgical outcomes should be compared prospectively to conventional laparoscopic BV. Copyright © 2013 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility, advantages, and disadvantages of the laparo-endoscopic single site surgery (LESS) technique for balloon vaginoplasty (BV). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care facility. RESULTS: LESS-BV was successfully performed in 6 patients with Mullerian aplasia and one with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). Patients presented with failure of intravaginal intercourse and/or dyspareunia. The procedure was performed successfully in conjunction with gonadectomy for the AIS case. The total operative time was 50-75 minutes. No operative complications were reported. Postoperative pain scores ranged from 0 to 2 points at rest and from 20 to 60 points during dressing change, increasing distension, and traction. The depths of the constructed neovaginas measured up to 12.8 cm. Sexual intercourse was initiated on the day of catheter removal. Penetrations and satisfactions scores increased to up 90 points for both partners. CONCLUSIONS: LESS-BV is technically feasible. LESS-BV allows better, stronger midline and long traction pass along the anatomic longitudinal axis of the hypoplastic vagina. Surgical outcomes should be compared prospectively to conventional laparoscopic BV. Copyright © 2013 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility, advantages, and disadvantages of the laparo-endoscopic single site surgery (LESS) technique for balloon vaginoplasty (BV). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care facility. RESULTS: LESS-BV was successfully performed in 6 patients with Mullerian aplasia and one with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). Patients presented with failure of intravaginal intercourse and/or dyspareunia. The procedure was performed successfully in conjunction with gonadectomy for the AIS case. The total operative time was 50-75 minutes. No operative complications were reported. Postoperative pain scores ranged from 0 to 2 points at rest and from 20 to 60 points during dressing change, increasing distension, and traction. The depths of the constructed neovaginas measured up to 12.8 cm. Sexual intercourse was initiated on the day of catheter removal. Penetrations and satisfactions scores increased to up 90 points for both partners. CONCLUSIONS: LESS-BV is technically feasible. LESS-BV allows better, stronger midline and long traction pass along the anatomic longitudinal axis of the hypoplastic vagina. Surgical outcomes should be compared prospectively to conventional laparoscopic BV. Copyright © 2013 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility, advantages, and disadvantages of the laparo-endoscopic single site surgery (LESS) technique for balloon vaginoplasty (BV). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care facility. RESULTS: LESS-BV was successfully performed in 6 patients with Mullerian aplasia and one with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). Patients presented with failure of intravaginal intercourse and/or dyspareunia. The procedure was performed successfully in conjunction with gonadectomy for the AIS case. The total operative time was 50-75 minutes. No operative complications were reported. Postoperative pain scores ranged from 0 to 2 points at rest and from 20 to 60 points during dressing change, increasing distension, and traction. The depths of the constructed neovaginas measured up to 12.8 cm. Sexual intercourse was initiated on the day of catheter removal. Penetrations and satisfactions scores increased to up 90 points for both partners. CONCLUSIONS: LESS-BV is technically feasible. LESS-BV allows better, stronger midline and long traction pass along the anatomic longitudinal axis of the hypoplastic vagina. Surgical outcomes should be compared prospectively to conventional laparoscopic BV. Copyright © 2013 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Abstract OBJECTIVES: To present the first repeat procedure and a simple way for management of balloon rupture during balloon vaginoplasty (BV) procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Repeat BV (reBV) procedure was done for one case, and a ruptured catheter's end to new catheter's end (ENE) procedure was done for two cases. The anatomic and functional outcomes of reBV and ENE are presented. RESULTS: Balloon rupture and deflation were encountered in a total of 3/45 cases who had undergone BV procedures. Replacement time was 22 min for reBV, and 9 and 10 min for ENE. General anesthesia was needed in the reBV case. Post-operative course and final outcomes were generally good but objectively less favorable in the ENE than in the reBV case (neovaginal depths were 8.5 and 9.4 cm versus 11 cm, respectively). Penetration and satisfaction scores were increased up 85 points for both couples. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon ruptures were reported in 3/45 cases undergoing balloon vaginoplasty. End to new catheter end replacement was a very fast and simple rescue procedure but its preliminary anatomical outcomes were less favorable than the outcomes obtained with the original or repeat procedure. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Abstract OBJECTIVES: To present the first repeat procedure and a simple way for management of balloon rupture during balloon vaginoplasty (BV) procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Repeat BV (reBV) procedure was done for one case, and a ruptured catheter's end to new catheter's end (ENE) procedure was done for two cases. The anatomic and functional outcomes of reBV and ENE are presented. RESULTS: Balloon rupture and deflation were encountered in a total of 3/45 cases who had undergone BV procedures. Replacement time was 22 min for reBV, and 9 and 10 min for ENE. General anesthesia was needed in the reBV case. Post-operative course and final outcomes were generally good but objectively less favorable in the ENE than in the reBV case (neovaginal depths were 8.5 and 9.4 cm versus 11 cm, respectively). Penetration and satisfaction scores were increased up 85 points for both couples. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon ruptures were reported in 3/45 cases undergoing balloon vaginoplasty. End to new catheter end replacement was a very fast and simple rescue procedure but its preliminary anatomical outcomes were less favorable than the outcomes obtained with the original or repeat procedure. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Abstract OBJECTIVES: To present the first repeat procedure and a simple way for management of balloon rupture during balloon vaginoplasty (BV) procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Repeat BV (reBV) procedure was done for one case, and a ruptured catheter's end to new catheter's end (ENE) procedure was done for two cases. The anatomic and functional outcomes of reBV and ENE are presented. RESULTS: Balloon rupture and deflation were encountered in a total of 3/45 cases who had undergone BV procedures. Replacement time was 22 min for reBV, and 9 and 10 min for ENE. General anesthesia was needed in the reBV case. Post-operative course and final outcomes were generally good but objectively less favorable in the ENE than in the reBV case (neovaginal depths were 8.5 and 9.4 cm versus 11 cm, respectively). Penetration and satisfaction scores were increased up 85 points for both couples. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon ruptures were reported in 3/45 cases undergoing balloon vaginoplasty. End to new catheter end replacement was a very fast and simple rescue procedure but its preliminary anatomical outcomes were less favorable than the outcomes obtained with the original or repeat procedure. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Abstract OBJECTIVES: To present the first repeat procedure and a simple way for management of balloon rupture during balloon vaginoplasty (BV) procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Repeat BV (reBV) procedure was done for one case, and a ruptured catheter's end to new catheter's end (ENE) procedure was done for two cases. The anatomic and functional outcomes of reBV and ENE are presented. RESULTS: Balloon rupture and deflation were encountered in a total of 3/45 cases who had undergone BV procedures. Replacement time was 22 min for reBV, and 9 and 10 min for ENE. General anesthesia was needed in the reBV case. Post-operative course and final outcomes were generally good but objectively less favorable in the ENE than in the reBV case (neovaginal depths were 8.5 and 9.4 cm versus 11 cm, respectively). Penetration and satisfaction scores were increased up 85 points for both couples. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon ruptures were reported in 3/45 cases undergoing balloon vaginoplasty. End to new catheter end replacement was a very fast and simple rescue procedure but its preliminary anatomical outcomes were less favorable than the outcomes obtained with the original or repeat procedure. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.