Skip to main content

Comparative application of different substaging techniques for non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma

Research Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical significance of 4 systems of substaging cases with non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma. In addition 4 cutoff measures were evaluated for prediction of muscularis-mucosa invasion. Four substaging systems were applied to 57 NMIBC cases to assess which of these reported methods correlates best with recurrence and progression. On univariate regression analysis patients having tumor size more than 3 cm, solid tumor architecture, high grade, substage B, substage T1e, substage ROL 2 and Tumor depth more than 1 mm were associated with higher recurrence. On multivariate analysis all the four substaging systems, tumor size, grade and tumor type had significant prognostic value for recurrence. Regarding progression only the metric substaging method was associated with tumor progression (p = 0.04). However, on univariate and multivariate …

 
Research Authors
Mohamed Emad Eldin, Rania Makboul, Hosny M Behnsawy, Islam F Abdelkawi, Ahmed M Moeen, Amr Abou Faddan, Mohamed Gadelmoula, Ahmed A Shahat, Mohamed Atef Abdel-Aziz, Moemen M Hafez, DA Hameed
Research Date
Research Department
Research Journal
Pathology & Oncology Research
Research Member
Research Pages
1823-1831
Research Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Research Vol
Volume 26, Issue 3
Research Website
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=1153896348866679703&btnI=1&hl=en
Research Year
2020