NULL

NULL

NULL

NULL

Three new series of 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives; series I (14, 16-18), series II (19-30) and series III (31-41) were synthesized as potential dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitors. Their chemical structures were confirmed using spectroscopic tools including IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The anti-inflammatory activity for all target compounds was evaluated in vivo using carrageenan-induced paw edema. Compound 36 showed the highest anti-inflammatory activity (114.12%) relative to reference drug indomethacin at 4 h interval. Selected derivatives were evaluated in vitro to inhibit ovine COX-1, human recombinant COX-2 and 5-LOX enzymes. Compounds 34 &35 exhibited significant COX-2 inhibition (IC50 = 0.10 µM) with significant COX-2 selectivity indices (SI = 135 & 145 respectively) approximate to celecoxib (IC50 = 0.049 µM, SI = 308.16) and exceeding indomethacin (IC50 = 0.51 µM, SI = 0.08). Interestingly, all compounds showed superior 5-LOX inhibitory activity about 2-5 times relative to zileuton. Compound 16 was the superlative 5-LOX inhibitor that revealed (IC50 = 3.41 µM) relative to zileuton (IC50 = 15.6 µM). Compounds 34, 35, 36 and 41 showed significant dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitions. The gastric ulcerogenic effect of compound 36 was examined on gastric mucosa of albino rats and they showed superior GI safety profile compared with indomethacin. Molecular docking studies of the compounds into the binding sites of COX-1, COX-2 and 5-LOX allowed us to shed light on the binding mode of these novels dual COX and 5-LOX inhibitors.

Three new series of 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives; series I (14, 16-18), series II (19-30) and series III (31-41) were synthesized as potential dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitors. Their chemical structures were confirmed using spectroscopic tools including IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The anti-inflammatory activity for all target compounds was evaluated in vivo using carrageenan-induced paw edema. Compound 36 showed the highest anti-inflammatory activity (114.12%) relative to reference drug indomethacin at 4 h interval. Selected derivatives were evaluated in vitro to inhibit ovine COX-1, human recombinant COX-2 and 5-LOX enzymes. Compounds 34 &35 exhibited significant COX-2 inhibition (IC50 = 0.10 µM) with significant COX-2 selectivity indices (SI = 135 & 145 respectively) approximate to celecoxib (IC50 = 0.049 µM, SI = 308.16) and exceeding indomethacin (IC50 = 0.51 µM, SI = 0.08). Interestingly, all compounds showed superior 5-LOX inhibitory activity about 2-5 times relative to zileuton. Compound 16 was the superlative 5-LOX inhibitor that revealed (IC50 = 3.41 µM) relative to zileuton (IC50 = 15.6 µM). Compounds 34, 35, 36 and 41 showed significant dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitions. The gastric ulcerogenic effect of compound 36 was examined on gastric mucosa of albino rats and they showed superior GI safety profile compared with indomethacin. Molecular docking studies of the compounds into the binding sites of COX-1, COX-2 and 5-LOX allowed us to shed light on the binding mode of these novels dual COX and 5-LOX inhibitors.

Three new series of 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives; series I (14, 16-18), series II (19-30) and series III (31-41) were synthesized as potential dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitors. Their chemical structures were confirmed using spectroscopic tools including IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The anti-inflammatory activity for all target compounds was evaluated in vivo using carrageenan-induced paw edema. Compound 36 showed the highest anti-inflammatory activity (114.12%) relative to reference drug indomethacin at 4 h interval. Selected derivatives were evaluated in vitro to inhibit ovine COX-1, human recombinant COX-2 and 5-LOX enzymes. Compounds 34 &35 exhibited significant COX-2 inhibition (IC50 = 0.10 µM) with significant COX-2 selectivity indices (SI = 135 & 145 respectively) approximate to celecoxib (IC50 = 0.049 µM, SI = 308.16) and exceeding indomethacin (IC50 = 0.51 µM, SI = 0.08). Interestingly, all compounds showed superior 5-LOX inhibitory activity about 2-5 times relative to zileuton. Compound 16 was the superlative 5-LOX inhibitor that revealed (IC50 = 3.41 µM) relative to zileuton (IC50 = 15.6 µM). Compounds 34, 35, 36 and 41 showed significant dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitions. The gastric ulcerogenic effect of compound 36 was examined on gastric mucosa of albino rats and they showed superior GI safety profile compared with indomethacin. Molecular docking studies of the compounds into the binding sites of COX-1, COX-2 and 5-LOX allowed us to shed light on the binding mode of these novels dual COX and 5-LOX inhibitors.

Three new series of 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives; series I (14, 16-18), series II (19-30) and series III (31-41) were synthesized as potential dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitors. Their chemical structures were confirmed using spectroscopic tools including IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The anti-inflammatory activity for all target compounds was evaluated in vivo using carrageenan-induced paw edema. Compound 36 showed the highest anti-inflammatory activity (114.12%) relative to reference drug indomethacin at 4 h interval. Selected derivatives were evaluated in vitro to inhibit ovine COX-1, human recombinant COX-2 and 5-LOX enzymes. Compounds 34 &35 exhibited significant COX-2 inhibition (IC50 = 0.10 µM) with significant COX-2 selectivity indices (SI = 135 & 145 respectively) approximate to celecoxib (IC50 = 0.049 µM, SI = 308.16) and exceeding indomethacin (IC50 = 0.51 µM, SI = 0.08). Interestingly, all compounds showed superior 5-LOX inhibitory activity about 2-5 times relative to zileuton. Compound 16 was the superlative 5-LOX inhibitor that revealed (IC50 = 3.41 µM) relative to zileuton (IC50 = 15.6 µM). Compounds 34, 35, 36 and 41 showed significant dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitions. The gastric ulcerogenic effect of compound 36 was examined on gastric mucosa of albino rats and they showed superior GI safety profile compared with indomethacin. Molecular docking studies of the compounds into the binding sites of COX-1, COX-2 and 5-LOX allowed us to shed light on the binding mode of these novels dual COX and 5-LOX inhibitors.

Three new series of 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives; series I (14, 16-18), series II (19-30) and series III (31-41) were synthesized as potential dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitors. Their chemical structures were confirmed using spectroscopic tools including IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The anti-inflammatory activity for all target compounds was evaluated in vivo using carrageenan-induced paw edema. Compound 36 showed the highest anti-inflammatory activity (114.12%) relative to reference drug indomethacin at 4 h interval. Selected derivatives were evaluated in vitro to inhibit ovine COX-1, human recombinant COX-2 and 5-LOX enzymes. Compounds 34 &35 exhibited significant COX-2 inhibition (IC50 = 0.10 µM) with significant COX-2 selectivity indices (SI = 135 & 145 respectively) approximate to celecoxib (IC50 = 0.049 µM, SI = 308.16) and exceeding indomethacin (IC50 = 0.51 µM, SI = 0.08). Interestingly, all compounds showed superior 5-LOX inhibitory activity about 2-5 times relative to zileuton. Compound 16 was the superlative 5-LOX inhibitor that revealed (IC50 = 3.41 µM) relative to zileuton (IC50 = 15.6 µM). Compounds 34, 35, 36 and 41 showed significant dual COX-2/5-LOX inhibitions. The gastric ulcerogenic effect of compound 36 was examined on gastric mucosa of albino rats and they showed superior GI safety profile compared with indomethacin. Molecular docking studies of the compounds into the binding sites of COX-1, COX-2 and 5-LOX allowed us to shed light on the binding mode of these novels dual COX and 5-LOX inhibitors.

Objective: Presentation of our center's experience in the management of intracorporeally-retained urological surgical items. Materials and Methods: Retrospective search of our center's data for cases of retained surgical items during the period July 2006 to June 2016. Each case was studied for the demographic and clinical variables including types, presentation, and management. Results: Out of more than 55,000 different urological interventions, only 39 cases (28 males and 11 females) had retained surgical items. Urolithiasis-related urological subspecialties were more involved than others. Forgotten items and technically-retained items occurred in 38.5 and 61.5% of cases, respectively, and were immediately discovered or discovered up to 10 years later. Material types were textiles, biosynthetics, and metallics in 31, 51, and 18%, respectively. Possible predisposing factors included complex surgeries, emergent intraoperative events, and extra approaches. Occurrences of retained surgical items before and after implemented corrective actions were 74.6 and 25.4%, respectively. All the final outcomes were either short- or long-term harm without deaths, organ losses, or permanent disabilities. Conclusion: Retained urological surgical items are surgical never events that result from forgetfulness or technical surgical human errors. Their sequels can be potentially fatal, but they are preventable and can be significantly reduced.