Objective To investigate the correlation between quantitative computed tomography (CT) perfusion findings in patients with colorectal thickening discovered at various imaging studies and histopathological examination. Patients and methods CT protocol included a precontrast scan. A region of 2 cm (four cuts) was selected based on the precontrast series. A dynamic study of the selected area was performed after contrast injection. Statistical analysis of the data was done. Results The current study enrolled 43 patients with suspected colorectal cancer; out of them, 39 patients were confirmed to have colorectal cancer based on the pathological evaluation. Blood flow of the thickened colon had 92% sensitivity and 50% specificity for diagnosing the malignant lesions, whereas blood volume had 97.4% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Permeability surface of the thickened part had 82% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Moreover, mean transit time had 44% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Conclusion Quantitative perfusion CT measurements enable differentiation and better discrimination between malignant and benign nature of colorectal thickening; however, the need for histopathological correlation cannot be omitted.

Objective To investigate the correlation between quantitative computed tomography (CT) perfusion findings in patients with colorectal thickening discovered at various imaging studies and histopathological examination. Patients and methods CT protocol included a precontrast scan. A region of 2 cm (four cuts) was selected based on the precontrast series. A dynamic study of the selected area was performed after contrast injection. Statistical analysis of the data was done. Results The current study enrolled 43 patients with suspected colorectal cancer; out of them, 39 patients were confirmed to have colorectal cancer based on the pathological evaluation. Blood flow of the thickened colon had 92% sensitivity and 50% specificity for diagnosing the malignant lesions, whereas blood volume had 97.4% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Permeability surface of the thickened part had 82% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Moreover, mean transit time had 44% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Conclusion Quantitative perfusion CT measurements enable differentiation and better discrimination between malignant and benign nature of colorectal thickening; however, the need for histopathological correlation cannot be omitted.

Objective To investigate the correlation between quantitative computed tomography (CT) perfusion findings in patients with colorectal thickening discovered at various imaging studies and histopathological examination. Patients and methods CT protocol included a precontrast scan. A region of 2 cm (four cuts) was selected based on the precontrast series. A dynamic study of the selected area was performed after contrast injection. Statistical analysis of the data was done. Results The current study enrolled 43 patients with suspected colorectal cancer; out of them, 39 patients were confirmed to have colorectal cancer based on the pathological evaluation. Blood flow of the thickened colon had 92% sensitivity and 50% specificity for diagnosing the malignant lesions, whereas blood volume had 97.4% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Permeability surface of the thickened part had 82% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Moreover, mean transit time had 44% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Conclusion Quantitative perfusion CT measurements enable differentiation and better discrimination between malignant and benign nature of colorectal thickening; however, the need for histopathological correlation cannot be omitted.

Background and Objectives. The use of complete mesocolic excision (CME) technique seems to be gaining popularity in the management of cancer colon. We aim to compare the laparoscopic approach for CME with the open approach in right colon cancer treatment with regard to the feasibility, safety, and perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Patients and Methods. A prospective study which included all patients that underwent radical right hemicolectomy for pathologic confirmed stage II or stage III tumor with CME at South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, from January 2012 to December 2019. Patients were grouped according to the surgical approach into the laparoscopic colectomy (LCME) group (n = 48) or open colectomy (OCME) group (n = 48). Results. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LCME group than that in the OCME group with less mean intraoperative blood loss. Conversion was required in 4 patients (8.3%) in the LCME group. The use of laparoscopy increased the number of harvested lymph nodes compared to the open approach (39.81 ± 16.74 vs. 32.65 ± 12.28, respectively, ). The laparoscopic approach was associated with a shorter time interval to first flatus as well as shorter time interval to liquid and normal diet after surgery. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LCME group. The complication rate was slightly lower in the LCME (14.7%) than in the OCME group (27.2%) (). The 3-year OS in the LCME group was similar to that in OCME (78.2% vs. 63.2%, respectively, value = 0.423). The three-year DFS in the laparoscopic group was higher (74.5%) than the …

Background and Objectives. The use of complete mesocolic excision (CME) technique seems to be gaining popularity in the management of cancer colon. We aim to compare the laparoscopic approach for CME with the open approach in right colon cancer treatment with regard to the feasibility, safety, and perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Patients and Methods. A prospective study which included all patients that underwent radical right hemicolectomy for pathologic confirmed stage II or stage III tumor with CME at South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, from January 2012 to December 2019. Patients were grouped according to the surgical approach into the laparoscopic colectomy (LCME) group (n = 48) or open colectomy (OCME) group (n = 48). Results. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LCME group than that in the OCME group with less mean intraoperative blood loss. Conversion was required in 4 patients (8.3%) in the LCME group. The use of laparoscopy increased the number of harvested lymph nodes compared to the open approach (39.81 ± 16.74 vs. 32.65 ± 12.28, respectively, ). The laparoscopic approach was associated with a shorter time interval to first flatus as well as shorter time interval to liquid and normal diet after surgery. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LCME group. The complication rate was slightly lower in the LCME (14.7%) than in the OCME group (27.2%) (). The 3-year OS in the LCME group was similar to that in OCME (78.2% vs. 63.2%, respectively, value = 0.423). The three-year DFS in the laparoscopic group was higher (74.5%) than the …

Background and Objectives. The use of complete mesocolic excision (CME) technique seems to be gaining popularity in the management of cancer colon. We aim to compare the laparoscopic approach for CME with the open approach in right colon cancer treatment with regard to the feasibility, safety, and perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Patients and Methods. A prospective study which included all patients that underwent radical right hemicolectomy for pathologic confirmed stage II or stage III tumor with CME at South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, from January 2012 to December 2019. Patients were grouped according to the surgical approach into the laparoscopic colectomy (LCME) group (n = 48) or open colectomy (OCME) group (n = 48). Results. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LCME group than that in the OCME group with less mean intraoperative blood loss. Conversion was required in 4 patients (8.3%) in the LCME group. The use of laparoscopy increased the number of harvested lymph nodes compared to the open approach (39.81 ± 16.74 vs. 32.65 ± 12.28, respectively, ). The laparoscopic approach was associated with a shorter time interval to first flatus as well as shorter time interval to liquid and normal diet after surgery. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LCME group. The complication rate was slightly lower in the LCME (14.7%) than in the OCME group (27.2%) (). The 3-year OS in the LCME group was similar to that in OCME (78.2% vs. 63.2%, respectively, value = 0.423). The three-year DFS in the laparoscopic group was higher (74.5%) than the …

Background and Objectives. The use of complete mesocolic excision (CME) technique seems to be gaining popularity in the management of cancer colon. We aim to compare the laparoscopic approach for CME with the open approach in right colon cancer treatment with regard to the feasibility, safety, and perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Patients and Methods. A prospective study which included all patients that underwent radical right hemicolectomy for pathologic confirmed stage II or stage III tumor with CME at South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, from January 2012 to December 2019. Patients were grouped according to the surgical approach into the laparoscopic colectomy (LCME) group (n = 48) or open colectomy (OCME) group (n = 48). Results. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LCME group than that in the OCME group with less mean intraoperative blood loss. Conversion was required in 4 patients (8.3%) in the LCME group. The use of laparoscopy increased the number of harvested lymph nodes compared to the open approach (39.81 ± 16.74 vs. 32.65 ± 12.28, respectively, ). The laparoscopic approach was associated with a shorter time interval to first flatus as well as shorter time interval to liquid and normal diet after surgery. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LCME group. The complication rate was slightly lower in the LCME (14.7%) than in the OCME group (27.2%) (). The 3-year OS in the LCME group was similar to that in OCME (78.2% vs. 63.2%, respectively, value = 0.423). The three-year DFS in the laparoscopic group was higher (74.5%) than the …

Background A retrospective multicentric study gathered 1439 CT chest studies with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affection. Three radiologists, blinded to other results, interpreted all studies using both lexicons with documentation of applicability and preferred score in assessing every case. The purpose of the study is to assess COVID-19 standardized assessment schemes’ (CO-RADS and COVID-RADS lexicons) applicability and diagnostic efficacy. Results This study included 991 RT-PCR-confirmed CT studies. An almost perfect agreement was found in COVID-RADS among the three observers (Fleiss Kappa = 0.82), opposed by a substantial agreement in CO-RADS (Κ = 0.78). The preference records favor COVID-RADS/CO-RADS in 78.5%/12.5%, 75.5%/24.5%, and 73.4%/24.5% regarding the three radiologists’ records, respectively. The distinguishability between positive and negative RT-PCR cases was 0.92 for COVID-RADS, while it was 0.85 for CO-RADS. On the other hand, both lexicons’ performance regarding clinical diagnosis and clinical suspicion index was 0.93 for COVID-RADS and 0.94 for CO-RADS. A very high to excellent agreement between the three observers for COVID-RADS/CO-RADS preference was concluded (Fleiss Kappa = 0.80 to 0.94). These results were statistically significant (p 0.001). Conclusion Both lexicon scores (CO-RADS and COVID-RADS) were found to be applicable in the COVID-19 structured report with the preference of COVID-RADS in more than 50% of cases. The diagnostic accuracy of COVID-RADS against RT-PCR was higher than that of CO-RADS.

Background A retrospective multicentric study gathered 1439 CT chest studies with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affection. Three radiologists, blinded to other results, interpreted all studies using both lexicons with documentation of applicability and preferred score in assessing every case. The purpose of the study is to assess COVID-19 standardized assessment schemes’ (CO-RADS and COVID-RADS lexicons) applicability and diagnostic efficacy. Results This study included 991 RT-PCR-confirmed CT studies. An almost perfect agreement was found in COVID-RADS among the three observers (Fleiss Kappa = 0.82), opposed by a substantial agreement in CO-RADS (Κ = 0.78). The preference records favor COVID-RADS/CO-RADS in 78.5%/12.5%, 75.5%/24.5%, and 73.4%/24.5% regarding the three radiologists’ records, respectively. The distinguishability between positive and negative RT-PCR cases was 0.92 for COVID-RADS, while it was 0.85 for CO-RADS. On the other hand, both lexicons’ performance regarding clinical diagnosis and clinical suspicion index was 0.93 for COVID-RADS and 0.94 for CO-RADS. A very high to excellent agreement between the three observers for COVID-RADS/CO-RADS preference was concluded (Fleiss Kappa = 0.80 to 0.94). These results were statistically significant (p 0.001). Conclusion Both lexicon scores (CO-RADS and COVID-RADS) were found to be applicable in the COVID-19 structured report with the preference of COVID-RADS in more than 50% of cases. The diagnostic accuracy of COVID-RADS against RT-PCR was higher than that of CO-RADS.

Background A retrospective multicentric study gathered 1439 CT chest studies with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affection. Three radiologists, blinded to other results, interpreted all studies using both lexicons with documentation of applicability and preferred score in assessing every case. The purpose of the study is to assess COVID-19 standardized assessment schemes’ (CO-RADS and COVID-RADS lexicons) applicability and diagnostic efficacy. Results This study included 991 RT-PCR-confirmed CT studies. An almost perfect agreement was found in COVID-RADS among the three observers (Fleiss Kappa = 0.82), opposed by a substantial agreement in CO-RADS (Κ = 0.78). The preference records favor COVID-RADS/CO-RADS in 78.5%/12.5%, 75.5%/24.5%, and 73.4%/24.5% regarding the three radiologists’ records, respectively. The distinguishability between positive and negative RT-PCR cases was 0.92 for COVID-RADS, while it was 0.85 for CO-RADS. On the other hand, both lexicons’ performance regarding clinical diagnosis and clinical suspicion index was 0.93 for COVID-RADS and 0.94 for CO-RADS. A very high to excellent agreement between the three observers for COVID-RADS/CO-RADS preference was concluded (Fleiss Kappa = 0.80 to 0.94). These results were statistically significant (p 0.001). Conclusion Both lexicon scores (CO-RADS and COVID-RADS) were found to be applicable in the COVID-19 structured report with the preference of COVID-RADS in more than 50% of cases. The diagnostic accuracy of COVID-RADS against RT-PCR was higher than that of CO-RADS.