Purpose To investigate the prognostic significance of standardized uptake value (SUV) of metastatic neck lymph nodes measured on FDG PET/CT in patients with stage IV oro/hypopharyngeal cancers treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods Retrospective analysis of 65 patients with clinically N+ stage IV SCC of the oro/hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who underwent FDG PET/CT scans for primary staging. Follow-up continued till death or at least 24 months from the start of treatment. The primary study endpoint was neck control (NC). The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to identify significant prognostic factors. Results The 3-year NC rate was 53%. In univariate analysis, N3 status and nodal SUV ≥ 9.8 were significantly associated with reduced NC. In multivariable analyses, nodal SUV retained its independent prognostic significance as a predictor of NC. Lymph node stage was an independent predictor of disease specific survival (DSS). A prognostic scoring system was constructed as follows: score 0 = N0-N2 and nodal SUV 9.8; score 1 = N3 or nodal SUV ≥ 9.8; and score 2 = N3 and nodal SUV ≥ 9.8. Patients with a score of 2 showed the worst NC (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]= 10.5, 3.3-33.1; P 0.001) and the lowest DSS (HR, 95% CI = 6.4, 2.2-18.7; P = 0.001). Conclusion The combination of high nodal SUV and N3 neck disease identifies a subgroup of high-risk stage IV oro/hypopharyngeal SCC patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate this finding.

This commentary addresses strengths and weaknesses of the clinical trial study protocol designed by Liu et al., in particular with regard of the methodology, taking into consideration the commentary article "Assessing surgical methods for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome - which is the best?" Our commentary emphasizes the importance of adjustment for known prognostic covariates, such as duration of symptoms and advanced age that have been negatively correlated with outcomes in previous studies. Subgroup analysis for the treatment groups of interest, namely moderate and severe cubital tunnel syndrome, which have previously shown conflicting differences in efficacy of surgical options is highly recommended. Intention-to-treat analysis is a preferable approach for the evaluation of primary outcome measures to lessen the bias. Use of well-validated composite outcome measure is strongly encouraged.

Background: Seroma formation after breast surgery could result in significant morbidity and subsequent delay to commence the adjuvant therapy. A prospective randomized study was done to assess the effect of obliterating the axillary dead space by sutures with Flap fixation after Breast cancer surgery either by Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) or Conservative Breast Surgery (CBS) prospectively. In addition, Factors predicting the formation of seroma were analyzed and reported. Methods: A total of 164 patients diagnosed as Breast cancer, they were randomized to have the post mastectomy dead space obliterated (intervention group) or standard wound closure (control group) following either MRM or CBS. Those had immediate reconstruction were excluded from the study. Drains were routinely left in place until the preceding 48-hour output was 30 milliliters/day. The duration of the drains left in place and the incidence of seroma formation were reported. A multivariate analysis for the potential factors associated with seroma formation was done. Results: Fifty -eight (n=58) patients were assigned to the treatment group and 106 (n=106) to the control group. MRM was performed on 105 patients (64%) and CBS on 59 (36%). Ten of the 58 patients (17.2%) in the intervention group developed a seroma in comparison to 33 of the 106 control patients (31.1%) (P=0.03). There was a significant reduction in the duration of suction drain in situ with obliteration of the dead space (P=0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between intervention and control groups with respect to patient and pathological parameters or the incidence of other wound complications. Multivariate analysis revealed that Significant risk factors for seroma formation were Diabetes Mellitus (DM) (P=0.01), neoadjuvant CTH (P=0.019), number of retrieved L node (P=0.019), and dead space obliteration (P=0.04). Conclusion: On multivariate analysis, the most significant factors affecting seroma formation were DM, neoadjuvant CTH, number of retrieved L node and Dead Space Obliteration. Dead Space Obliteration following breast cancer surgery is a simple technique that reduces the time of suction tubal drainage, and incidence of seroma formation.

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) represents the most common and aggressive biliary tract cancer with overall 5-year survival being only 5%–10%. Survival following resection, especially in early stages, has shown some improvement due to advances in surgical treatment. Advanced stages, however, continue to have dismal outcome. Complete surgical resection offers the only chance for cure, which extended from simple cholecystectomy to major hepatectomy or enbloc resection of adjacent organs. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of longterm survival in patients with gall bladder cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 38 patients who underwent curative (R0) resection for GBC between January 2001 and December 2010 in Surgical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Egypt. Surgical procedures included simple cholecystectomy (10.5%), radical cholecystectomy (75.4%), bile duct resection (33.8), and right hepatectomy (7.8%). Adjacent organ resection was performed in (23.4%), duodenal sleeve resection (10.4%), segmental colectomy (5.2%), segmental gastrectomy (2.6%), Hepatopancreatico-duodenectomy (5.3 %). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given for (68.4%) of patients and adjuvant radiotherapy for (36.8%) of patients. Median follow up period of the patients was 38 months (0.5-69 months). Results: The median disease free survival (DFS) for GBC patients was 38 months. Univariate analysis revealed that patient’s age, comorbidities, weight loss, jaundice, tumor differentiation, organ invasion, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, tumor stage and chemotherapy were associated with the patient’s survival. Of these, weight loss, jaundice, lymph node metastasis and tumor stage were found to influence the overall survival on the multivariate Cox Hazard Regression analysis. First year overall survival estimate was 86.84% ±5.5%, 2nd year = 71.05% ± 7.4%, Third year 60.53% ± 7.9% fifth year =15.79% ± 5.9%. Conclusion: Curative surgical resection remains the only effective approach for treatment of GBC. This study confirms that jaundice, weight loss and aggressive tumor (advanced stage and regional lymph nodes metastasis) are predictors of poor prognosis.

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) represents the most common and aggressive biliary tract cancer with overall 5-year survival being only 5%–10%. Survival following resection, especially in early stages, has shown some improvement due to advances in surgical treatment. Advanced stages, however, continue to have dismal outcome. Complete surgical resection offers the only chance for cure, which extended from simple cholecystectomy to major hepatectomy or enbloc resection of adjacent organs. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of longterm survival in patients with gall bladder cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 38 patients who underwent curative (R0) resection for GBC between January 2001 and December 2010 in Surgical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Egypt. Surgical procedures included simple cholecystectomy (10.5%), radical cholecystectomy (75.4%), bile duct resection (33.8), and right hepatectomy (7.8%). Adjacent organ resection was performed in (23.4%), duodenal sleeve resection (10.4%), segmental colectomy (5.2%), segmental gastrectomy (2.6%), Hepatopancreatico-duodenectomy (5.3 %). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given for (68.4%) of patients and adjuvant radiotherapy for (36.8%) of patients. Median follow up period of the patients was 38 months (0.5-69 months). Results: The median disease free survival (DFS) for GBC patients was 38 months. Univariate analysis revealed that patient’s age, comorbidities, weight loss, jaundice, tumor differentiation, organ invasion, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, tumor stage and chemotherapy were associated with the patient’s survival. Of these, weight loss, jaundice, lymph node metastasis and tumor stage were found to influence the overall survival on the multivariate Cox Hazard Regression analysis. First year overall survival estimate was 86.84% ±5.5%, 2nd year = 71.05% ± 7.4%, Third year 60.53% ± 7.9% fifth year =15.79% ± 5.9%. Conclusion: Curative surgical resection remains the only effective approach for treatment of GBC. This study confirms that jaundice, weight loss and aggressive tumor (advanced stage and regional lymph nodes metastasis) are predictors of poor prognosis.

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) represents the most common and aggressive biliary tract cancer with overall 5-year survival being only 5%–10%. Survival following resection, especially in early stages, has shown some improvement due to advances in surgical treatment. Advanced stages, however, continue to have dismal outcome. Complete surgical resection offers the only chance for cure, which extended from simple cholecystectomy to major hepatectomy or enbloc resection of adjacent organs. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of longterm survival in patients with gall bladder cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 38 patients who underwent curative (R0) resection for GBC between January 2001 and December 2010 in Surgical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Egypt. Surgical procedures included simple cholecystectomy (10.5%), radical cholecystectomy (75.4%), bile duct resection (33.8), and right hepatectomy (7.8%). Adjacent organ resection was performed in (23.4%), duodenal sleeve resection (10.4%), segmental colectomy (5.2%), segmental gastrectomy (2.6%), Hepatopancreatico-duodenectomy (5.3 %). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given for (68.4%) of patients and adjuvant radiotherapy for (36.8%) of patients. Median follow up period of the patients was 38 months (0.5-69 months). Results: The median disease free survival (DFS) for GBC patients was 38 months. Univariate analysis revealed that patient’s age, comorbidities, weight loss, jaundice, tumor differentiation, organ invasion, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, tumor stage and chemotherapy were associated with the patient’s survival. Of these, weight loss, jaundice, lymph node metastasis and tumor stage were found to influence the overall survival on the multivariate Cox Hazard Regression analysis. First year overall survival estimate was 86.84% ±5.5%, 2nd year = 71.05% ± 7.4%, Third year 60.53% ± 7.9% fifth year =15.79% ± 5.9%. Conclusion: Curative surgical resection remains the only effective approach for treatment of GBC. This study confirms that jaundice, weight loss and aggressive tumor (advanced stage and regional lymph nodes metastasis) are predictors of poor prognosis.

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) represents the most common and aggressive biliary tract cancer with overall 5-year survival being only 5%–10%. Survival following resection, especially in early stages, has shown some improvement due to advances in surgical treatment. Advanced stages, however, continue to have dismal outcome. Complete surgical resection offers the only chance for cure, which extended from simple cholecystectomy to major hepatectomy or enbloc resection of adjacent organs. The aim of this study was to examine the predictors of longterm survival in patients with gall bladder cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 38 patients who underwent curative (R0) resection for GBC between January 2001 and December 2010 in Surgical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Egypt. Surgical procedures included simple cholecystectomy (10.5%), radical cholecystectomy (75.4%), bile duct resection (33.8), and right hepatectomy (7.8%). Adjacent organ resection was performed in (23.4%), duodenal sleeve resection (10.4%), segmental colectomy (5.2%), segmental gastrectomy (2.6%), Hepatopancreatico-duodenectomy (5.3 %). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given for (68.4%) of patients and adjuvant radiotherapy for (36.8%) of patients. Median follow up period of the patients was 38 months (0.5-69 months). Results: The median disease free survival (DFS) for GBC patients was 38 months. Univariate analysis revealed that patient’s age, comorbidities, weight loss, jaundice, tumor differentiation, organ invasion, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, tumor stage and chemotherapy were associated with the patient’s survival. Of these, weight loss, jaundice, lymph node metastasis and tumor stage were found to influence the overall survival on the multivariate Cox Hazard Regression analysis. First year overall survival estimate was 86.84% ±5.5%, 2nd year = 71.05% ± 7.4%, Third year 60.53% ± 7.9% fifth year =15.79% ± 5.9%. Conclusion: Curative surgical resection remains the only effective approach for treatment of GBC. This study confirms that jaundice, weight loss and aggressive tumor (advanced stage and regional lymph nodes metastasis) are predictors of poor prognosis.

Purpose In this study, we aim to report the efficacy of using the anterior approach (AA) versus the conventional approach (CA), in surgical resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (≥7 cm) of the right hepatic lobe in terms of surgical and long-term outcomes. Materials and Methods Between 2000 and 2006, 138 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection with curative intent for large right lobe HCC ≥7 cm were identified from a retrospective database. The 40 patients who had AA were compared with the remaining 98 patients who had CA. Clinicopathological features and surgical results were analyzed and prognostic factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups as regards clinical, laboratory, and pathological parameters. The operative results had shown a comparable proportion of patients who experienced massive operative blood loss and postoperative complications in the two groups. The AA group had a lower recurrence rate (P = 0·015), better diseasefree survival (DFS) (P = 0·001), and overall survival than the CA group. Our study identified that AA is a prognostic factor of both overall survival and disease-free survival for large HCC ≥7 cm. Conclusion The AA is a safe and effective technique for right hepatic resection for large HCC and achieves more advantageous long survival outcome over the CA.

Introduction: Dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) is commonly used to induce a murine fulminant colitis model. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) has been shown to decrease the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but the effect of its activator, HGFA, is not well characterized. Arginine reduces effects of oxidative stress but its effect on IBD is not well known. The primary aim is to determine whether HGF and HGFA, or arginine will decrease IBD symptoms such as pain and diarrhea in a DSS-induced fulminant colitis murine model. Methods: A severe colitis was induced in young, male Fischer 344 rats with 4% (w/v) DSS oral solution for seven days; rats were sacrificed on day 10. Rats were divided into five groups of 8 animals: control, HGF (700 mcg/kg/dose), HGF and HGFA (10 mcg/dose), HGF and arginine, and high dose HGF (2800 mcg/kg/ dose). Main clinical outcomes were pain, diarrhea and weight loss. Blinded pathologists scored the terminal ileum and distal colon. Results: DSS reliably induced severe active colitis in 90% of animals (n ¼ 36/40). There were no differences in injury scores between control and treatment animals. HGF led to 1.38 fewer days in pain (p ¼ 0.036), while arginine led to 1.88 fewer days of diarrhea (P ¼ 0.017) compared to controls. 88% of HGFA-treated rats started regaining weight (P 0.001). Discussion/Conclusion: Although treatment was unable to reverse fulminant disease, HGF and arginine were associated with decreased days of pain and diarrhea. These clinical interventions may reduce associated symptoms for severe IBD patients, even when urgent surgical intervention remains the only viable option.

Background Postoperative ileus (POI) is a major cause of morbidity, increased length of stay (LOS) and hospital cost after colorectal surgery. Alvimopan is a l-opioid antagonist used to accelerate upper and lower gastrointestinal function after bowel resection. We hypothesized that alvimopan would reduce LOS in patients undergoing colorectal resection with stoma, a situation that has not been evaluated. Methods A retrospective review (2010–2015) identified 58 patients who underwent colorectal resection for benign or malignant disease with stoma creation and received alvimopan. They were case-matched to 58 non-alvimopan patients based on age, BMI, baseline comorbidities, stoma type created and surgical approach. We compared overall LOS, incidence ofPOI and other postoperative complications. Results There were equal numbers of laparoscopic (N = 18) and open resections (N = 40) in the alvimopan group and non-alvimopan group. There were also equal numbers of patients with an ileostomy (N = 37) or colostomy (N = 21) in each group. Overall, 41 patients underwent resection for malignant disease in the alvimopan group compared to 37 in the non-alvimopan group. There was a significant reduction in median LOS overall (alvimopan 5 (4–7) versus control 6 (4.75–9.25) days, P = 0.03). While the 6-day median LOS was similar for patients undergoing ileostomy creation (P = 0.25), alvimopan patients had a 3-day decreased median LOS that approached statistical significance (P = 0.06). The overall 30-day complication rate was higher in the control group (41.4 vs. 51.7%, P = 0.26), but the readmission rate within 30 days was higher in the alvimopan group (19 vs. 13.8%, P = 0.45). Neither of these differences reached statistically significance. Conclusion The use of alvimopan in patients undergoing colorectal resection with stoma is associated with a significantly shorter LOS, but the increased readmission rate warrants further study. Based on these data, alvimopan should be evaluated in a controlled setting for patients undergoing colorectal resection with colostomy creation.